I agree that the Firefox forks are somewhat underwhelming. It is based on older Chrome and is surprisingly compatible with a lot of th I did lose a bit on addon compatibility, but the overall experience is better for me.ĭr_st wrote: I personally use Flashpeak Slimjet 10 with XP/Vista. Lo and behold, no such problems with Slimjet. Never found a solution, and decided to try something else. I haven't tested this aspect of it, since I all systems I currently use have at least 2GB RAM.īefore Slimjet I was using Firefox forks - Pale Moon / Basilisk (also by Pale Moon team), but grew steadily unhappy with two things - loss of compatibility with modern web on old versions and unexplained sluggishness on new versions (where the browser starts fast and gradually slows down to the point that even switching tabs feels slow).

The browser is fast, but may not be as memory-efficient (Chrome was never great about memory efficiency). Vista's situation is better because Vista supports more ciphers than XP natively. On XP I have a growing number of websites that won't open due to cipher mismatches. It is based on older Chrome and is surprisingly compatible with a lot of the modern web still.

I personally use Flashpeak Slimjet 10 with XP/Vista.

Mypal browser for windows xp 32 bit